Claremore Daily Progress

Our View

December 4, 2012

Rejecting federal health care bill right thing

OKLAHOMA CITY — This past month, I announced Oklahoma would not implement two key components of President Obama’s health care law: the creation of a health insurance exchange and the expansion of Medicaid. I’m writing this month to let you know why that decision is in the best interests of Oklahoma taxpayers and families.

 For several months, my staff and I have worked with other lawmakers, Oklahoma stakeholders and health care experts across the country to determine the best course of action for Oklahoma in regards to both a possible health insurance exchange and the potential expansion of Medicaid.
 Our priority has been to ascertain what can be done to increase quality and access to health care, contain costs, and do so without placing an undue burden on taxpayers or the state. As I have stated many times before, it is my firm belief that the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) fails to further these goals, and will in fact decrease the quality of health care across the United States while contributing to the nation’s growing deficit crisis.
 Despite my ongoing opposition to the federal health care law, however, the state of Oklahoma found itself legally obligated to either build an exchange that is PPACA compliant and approved by the Obama Administration, or to default to an exchange run by the federal government. This choice was forced on the people of Oklahoma by the Obama Administration in spite of the fact that voters have overwhelmingly expressed their opposition to the federal health care law time and time again.
After careful consideration, I decided last month that Oklahoma would not pursue the creation of its own health insurance exchange. As I said at the time, any exchange that is PPACA compliant will necessarily be ‘state-run’ in name only and would require Oklahoma resources, staff and tax dollars to implement. It does not benefit Oklahoma taxpayers to actively support and fund a new government program that would ultimately be under the control of the federal government and that is opposed by a clear majority of Oklahomans. Furthermore, the creation of such an exchange would further the implementation of a law that threatens to erode both the quality of American health care and the fiscal stability of the nation.
With regards to Medicaid, I also announced that Oklahoma would not be participating in the Obama Administration’s proposed expansion. Such an expansion would have been unaffordable, costing the state of Oklahoma $475 million between now and 2020, with escalating annual expenses in subsequent years. It would also have furthered Oklahoma’s reliance on federal money that may or may not have been available in the future given the dire fiscal problems facing the federal government. On a state level, massive new costs associated with Medicaid expansion would also have required cuts to important government priorities such as education and public safety. Finally, the proposed Medicaid expansion offers no meaningful reform to a massive entitlement program already contributing to the out-of-control spending of the federal government.
 Moving forward, it is important for the state of Oklahoma to pursue two actions simultaneously. The first will be to continue support for Oklahoma Attorney General Scott Pruitt’s ongoing legal challenge of PPACA. General Pruitt’s lawsuit raises different Constitutional questions than previous legal challenges, and both he and I remain optimistic that Oklahoma’s challenge can succeed.
 Our second and equally important task will be to pursue state-based solutions that improve health outcomes and contain costs for Oklahoma families. 
Serious reform, for instance, should be pursued in the area of Medicaid and public health, where effective chronic disease prevention and management programs could address the trend of skyrocketing medical bills linked to avoidable hospital and emergency room visits. I look forward to working with legislative leaders and lawmakers in both parties to pursue Oklahoma health care solutions for Oklahoma families.
Mary Fallin is the governor of Oklahoma.

Text Only
Our View
  • Editorial: Seizure of AP phone records insult to independent press

    This amounts to spying on an American news organization -- common practice in dictatorships but scary conduct in a democratic system that prizes the public value of an independent watchdog press.

    May 17, 2013

  • Bailey Dabney One-Cent Sales Tax Renewal

    “Sir, you spend money like a drunken sailor,” County Commissioner Kirt Thacker said to County Commissioner Mike Helm in a Board of County Commissioners meeting this past October. “It is time that we either get this under control or public trust will forever be diminished at least in Rogers County.”

    May 13, 2013 1 Photo

  • Burrage, sean.tiff Senate review by Sean Burrage

    Hailey Mathis is studying political science and history at the University of Oklahoma. She’s one of a very select group of college students each year who have the opportunity to learn about government and public service through an internship at the State Senate.  

    April 4, 2011 1 Photo

  • Legislative action

    The second deadline week of the session ended last Thursday and by the end of the week, 41 Senate measures remained on general order, essentially making them dormant until the next ye

    April 30, 2013

  • Rep. Chuck Hoskin Fund education first

    The ninth week of session included a bittersweet mixture of activity here at the capitol. 

    April 8, 2013 1 Photo

  • Burrage, Sean.jpg Senate Review

    One of the major milestones in our children’s lives is high school graduation—it celebrates the end of one era of their lives, and the beginning of the next.  

    April 6, 2013 1 Photo

  • State bills to watch

     “A government  that robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend on the support of Paul.” — George Bernard Shaw 

    Last week ended on a snowy, slushy note as the House convened to finish the third week of the session. We only have one more week to go before hitting the first of our deadline weeks, marking the point where all committee work for legislation originating  in the House must be completed.

    February 26, 2013

  • Federal government dysfunction

    Dysfunction in the federal government and the “us vs. them” mentality has brought us close to the sequestration deadline. Resorting to these types of cuts is government at its worst.

    February 26, 2013

  • Many federal jobs could be eliminated

    With Congress facing sequestration like nearly every other federal agency, I conducted a top to bottom review of my office and eliminated seven full time positions over the past year while sending back more than $242,800 in office budget authority.  While this has required doing more with less, we have succeeded in maintaining the same quality of constituent services and level of representation with a leaner team.

    February 26, 2013

  • LambToddweb.jpg Policy matters

    When the Oklahoma legislative session begins each February, elected officials begin their work addressing state issues.  The people of Oklahoma put trust in those they elect to adequately represent their voice and responsibly govern the entire state. 

    February 18, 2013 1 Photo